Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Hart et al. v. Selected Investments Trust Fund, Linwood O. Neal, Trustee, et al., 1959 — 359 U.S. 914 · caselaw · US
Securities
Hart et al. v. Selected Investments Trust Fund, Linwood O. Neal, Trustee, et al.
359 U.S. 914·Supreme Court of the United States·1959
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 600.
Hart et al. v. Selected Investments Trust Fund, Linwood O. Neal, Trustee, et al.
George Zolotar for petitioners.
George E. Soule, James D. Fellers and Luther Bqhanon for Harrison, respondent.
Solicitor General Rankin, Thomas G. Meeker, David Ferber and Arthur Blasberg, Jr. for the Securities and Exchange Commission in opposition.
[MAJORITY]
Motion to substitute W. M. Harrison as a party respondent in the place of Paul C. Duncan, resigned, granted. Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.