Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
New Mexico State Game Commission v. United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit et al., 1969 — 396 U.S. 953 · caselaw · US
General
New Mexico State Game Commission v. United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit et al.
396 U.S. 953·Supreme Court of the United States·1969
Mr. Justice Douglas is of the opinion that the motion should be granted.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 919,
Misc.
New Mexico State Game Commission v. United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit et al.
James A. Maloney, Attorney General of New Mexico, and James E. Sperling, George T. Harris, Jr., and Peter J. Broullire III, Special Assistant Attorneys General, on the motion.
[MAJORITY]
Motion for leave to file petition for writ of mandamus denied.
Mr. Justice Douglas is of the opinion that the motion should be granted.