Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Glidden Company et al. v. United States, 1941 — 314 U.S. 678 · caselaw · US
Contracts · MBE-tested
Glidden Company et al. v. United States
314 U.S. 678·Supreme Court of the United States·1941
Mr. Justice Reed and Mr. Justice Jackson took no part in the consideration and decision of this application.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Nos. 641 and 642.
Glidden Company et al. v. United States.
November 10, 1941.
Messrs. H. J. Crawford, Frank Harrison, and Roger Hinds for petitioners. Assistant Solicitor General Fahy, Assistant Attorney General Clark, and Mr. J. Louis Monarch for the United States.
[MAJORITY]
Petition for writs of cer-tiorari to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
Mr. Justice Reed and Mr. Justice Jackson took no part in the consideration and decision of this application.