Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Aaron B. Cohu, as Executor, etc., Respondent, v. Joseph Husson, Appellant, 1889 — 117 N.Y. 631 · caselaw · US
General
Aaron B. Cohu, as Executor, etc., Respondent, v. Joseph Husson, Appellant
117 N.Y. 631·New York Court of Appeals·1889·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Aaron B. Cohu, as Executor, etc., Respondent, v. Joseph Husson, Appellant.
(Argued October 21, 1889.)
Appeal from so much of order of the General Term of the Superior Court of the city of New York, made June 4, 1889, as allowed plaintiff to appeal from a judgment to said General Term upon payment of certain costs.
Edward P. Wilder for appellant.
Abram Kling for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Dismissed on argument.