Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
COLUMBIA BROADCASTING SYSTEM, INC., et al. v. ATKINSON et al., 1958 — 357 U.S. 569 · caselaw · US
Contracts · MBE-tested
COLUMBIA BROADCASTING SYSTEM, INC., et al. v. ATKINSON et al.
357 U.S. 569·Supreme Court of the United States·1958
Mr. Justice Douglas took no part in the consideration or decision of these cages.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
COLUMBIA BROADCASTING SYSTEM, INC., et al. v. ATKINSON et al.
No. 756.
Decided June 30, 1958.
Homer I. Mitchell for the Columbia Broadcasting System, Inc., et al., appellants in Nos. 756 and 757.
Henry Kaiser, Emanuel L. Gordon and Michael G. Luddy for appellant in No. 759.
Harold A. Fendler and Daniel A. Weber for appellees.
Together with No. 757, Radio Corporation of America et al. v. Anderson et al., and No. 759, American Federation of Musicians of the United States and Canada v. Atkinson et al., also on appeals from the same Court.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam.]
Per Curiam.
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeals are dismissed. Treating the papers whereon the appeals were taken as petitions for writs of certiorari, certiorari is denied.
Mr. Justice Douglas took no part in the consideration or decision of these cages.