Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Safe Harbor Water Power Corp. v. United States et al., 1941 — 313 U.S. 546 · caselaw · US
General
Safe Harbor Water Power Corp. v. United States et al.
313 U.S. 546·Supreme Court of the United States·1941
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Nos. 907 and 908.
Safe Harbor Water Power Corp. v. United States et al.
May 12, 1941.
Messrs. Charles Markell and Edwin M. Sturtevant for appellant. Solicitor General Biddle for appellees.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam,:]
Per Curiam,:
The motion to dismiss is granted, and the appeals are dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Stratton v. St. Louis S. W. Ry. Co., 282 U. S. 10, 15-16; Virginian Ry. Co. v. United States, 272 U. S. 658, 671-672; Ex parte Atlantic Coast Line R. Co., 279 U. S. 822. See Federal Power Act, § 313 (b) (Act of August 26,1935, c. 687, Title II, § 213,49 Stat. 847,860,16 U. S. C., § 825L (b)).