Skip to main content

Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.

Alford v. Central Intelligence Agency; Morton v. Stynchcombe, Sheriff, et al.; Rosado et al. v. Civiletti, Attorney General, et al.; Thiess v. Franklin Square Hospital, Inc., et al.; Rucker v. Fickas et al.; Clugston et al. v. Michigan et al.; Smith v. Assignment Office of Montgomery County Circuit Court et al.; Prejean v. Louisiana; Hunter v. Wainwright, Secretary, Department of Offender Rehabilitation of Florida; Maratty v. Kentucky; Green v. Bartholomew et al.; Hynning v. DuFief Mortgage, Inc., et al.; Dual Manufacturing & Engineering, Inc., et al. v. Burris Industries, Inc., et al., In re Chestnutt Management Corp., Johnston v. United States et al.; Johns v. Nanawale Community Assn. et al.; Newbold v. United States Postal Service et al.; Quinones v. Texas; Clay, Administrator v. Hall et al., 1980 — 449 U.S. 1027 · caselaw · US