General
Roger Sherman, Successor in Trust, and D. H. Pinney, Plaintiffs in Error, v. Libbie Goodwin
223 U.S. 711·Supreme Court of the United States·1911
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 23.
Roger Sherman, Successor in Trust, and D. H. Pinney, Plaintiffs in Error, v. Libbie Goodwin.
In error to the Supreme Court of the Territory of Arizona.
Submitted October 26, 1911.
Decided November 6, 1911.
Mr. Walter Bennett and Mr. D. H. Pinney for the plaintiffs in error. Mr. J. F. Wilson for the defendant in error.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam.]
Per Curiam.
Dismissed for the want of
jurisdiction. Idaho & O. Land Improvement Co. v. Bradbury, 132 U. S. 509, 513; Garzot v. Rios de Rubio, 209 U. S. 284.