Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Haywood v. United States; and Jessup v. United States, 1969 — 396 U.S. 852 · caselaw · US
General
Haywood v. United States; and Jessup v. United States
396 U.S. 852·Supreme Court of the United States·1969
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 83, No. 139,
Misc.
Misc.
Haywood v. United States; and Jessup v. United States.
Frederic A. Johnson and Rudolph Lion Zalowitz for petitioner in No. 83, Misc. Robert Kasanoj for petitioner in No. 139, Misc. Solicitor General Griswold for the United States in No. 83, Misc. Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney General Wilson, Jerome M. Feit, and Roger A. Pauley for the United States in No. 139, Misc.
[MAJORITY]
C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.
Reported below: 409 F. 2d 888.