Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Decker, U. S. District Judge, et al. v. Harper & Row Publishers, Inc., et al., 1970 — 397 U.S. 1073 · caselaw · US
General
Decker, U. S. District Judge, et al. v. Harper & Row Publishers, Inc., et al.
397 U.S. 1073·Supreme Court of the United States·1970
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 1337.
Decker, U. S. District Judge, et al. v. Harper & Row Publishers, Inc., et al.
Lee A. Freeman and Lee A. Freeman, Jr., for petitioners. H. Templeton Brown, Robert L. Stern, and Lee N. Abrams for respondent William Morrow & Co., Inc., W. Donald McSweeney for respondents Bobbs-Merrill Co., Inc., et al., Earl E. Pollock for respondent Baker & Taylor Co., Peter Gruenberger for respondents Charles Scribner's Sons et al., Conrad W. Oberdorfer for respondent Houghton Mifflin Co., Earl A. Jinkinson for respondent Franklin Watts, Inc., Edgar E. Barton for respondent McGraw-Hill Book Co., Leo Rosen and Roger Hunting for respondents Thomas Y. Crowell Co. et al., Samuel Weisbard for respondent Golden Press, Inc., Bruce Hecker and David P. List for respondent Campbell & Hall, Inc., and Nathan Blumberg for respondent Follett Library Book Co.
[MAJORITY]
C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari granted.