Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Monks v. Lee, 1946 — 326 U.S. 696 · caselaw · US
Contracts · MBE-tested
Monks v. Lee
326 U.S. 696·Supreme Court of the United States·1946
Mr. Justice Rutledge took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 724.
Monks v. Lee.
January 28, 1946.
Mr. Herbert S. Avery for appellant.
Mr. Robert E. Goodwin for appellee.
See 318 Mass. 513, 62 N. E. 2d 657.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam:]
Per Curiam:
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. § 237 (a), Judicial Code, as amended, 28 U. S. C. § 344 (a). Treating the papers whereon the appeal was allowed as a petition for writ of certiorari as required by § 237 (c) of the Judicial Code, as amended, 28 U. S. C. § 344 (c), certiorari is denied.
Mr. Justice Rutledge took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.