Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Rosa Feierstein, Respondent, v. Supreme Lodge, Knights of Honor, Appellant, Impleaded with Others, 1903 — 173 N.Y. 639 · caselaw · US
General
Rosa Feierstein, Respondent, v. Supreme Lodge, Knights of Honor, Appellant, Impleaded with Others
173 N.Y. 639·New York Court of Appeals·1903·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Rosa Feierstein, Respondent, v. Supreme Lodge, Knights of Honor, Appellant, Impleaded with Others.
Feierstein v. Supreme Lodge K. of II., 69 App. Div. 53, appeal withdrawn.
(Argued February 9, 1903;
decided February 17, 1903.)
Motion for leave to withdraw an appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered February 7, 1902, which reversed a judgment in favor of defendant entered upon a verdict and an order denying a motion for a new trial and granted a new trial.
The motion was made upon the ground that the order was not apjiealable.
Henry A. Powell for motion.
Alfred Epstein opposed.
[MAJORITY]
Motion granted on condition that the terms imposed on the plaintiff by the Appellate Division be waived.