Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Lillie H. COHEN, Appellant, v. Joseph A. PETTY, Appellee, 1933 — 65 F.2d 822 · caselaw · US
General
Lillie H. COHEN, Appellant, v. Joseph A. PETTY, Appellee
65 F.2d 822·United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia·1933
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Lillie H. COHEN, Appellant, v. Joseph A. PETTY, Appellee.
No. 5812.
Court of Appeals of the District of Columbia.
Argued May 5, 1933.
Decided May 29, 1933.
Before MARTIN, Chief Justice, and VAN ORSDEL, HITZ, and GRONER, Associate Justices.
[MAJORITY — GRONER, Associate Justice.]
GRONER, Associate Justice.
This ease is ruled by our conclusion in Jeanette Cohen v. Joseph A. Petty, 62 App. D. C.-, 65 F.(2d) 820, decided this day, and accordingly the judgment of the lower court is affirmed.
Affirmed.