General
Julius MINTZ and Louis Goldberg, Copartners Trading as J. Mintz & Co., Plaintiffs in Error, v. UNITED STATES, Defendant in Error
30 F.2d 1014·United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit·1929
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Julius MINTZ and Louis Goldberg, Copartners Trading as J. Mintz & Co., Plaintiffs in Error, v. UNITED STATES, Defendant in Error.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.
February 4, 1929.
No. 67.
Archibald Palmer, of New York City (Chauncey Hartan Levy, of New York City,, of counsel), for plaintiffs in error.
Charles H. Tuttle, U. S. Atty., of New York City (Herman Forster, Asst. U. S. Atty., of New York City, of counsel), for the United States.
Before MANTON, L. HAND, and SWAN, Circuit Judges.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
Judgment affirmed; mandate to issue forthwith.