Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Insurance Group Committee et al. v. Denver & Rio Grande Western Railroad Co. et al., 1946 — 329 U.S. 708 · caselaw · US
Corporations
Insurance Group Committee et al. v. Denver & Rio Grande Western Railroad Co. et al.
329 U.S. 708·Supreme Court of the United States·1946
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 690.
Insurance Group Committee et al. v. Denver & Rio Grande Western Railroad Co. et al.
December 16, 1946.
Henry W. Anderson, George D. Gibson, John W. Riely, Morrison Shafroth, William Grant, Alexander M. Lewis, Edwin S. S. Sunderland, James L. Homire, Kenneth F. Burgess, Walter J. Cummings, Jr., W. A. W. Stewart and Arthur A. Gammell for petitioners. William V. Hodges and Frank C. Nicodemus, Jr. for respondents. Acting Solicitor General Washington, John D. Goodloe and W. Meade Fletcher filed a memorandum for the Reconstruction Finance Corporation.
[MAJORITY]
Petition for writ of certiorari to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit granted.