General
Charles L. Rathborne, Respondent, v. Edward Hatch, Appellant
181 N.Y. 520·New York Court of Appeals·1905·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Charles L. Rathborne, Respondent, v. Edward Hatch, Appellant.
Rathborne v. Hatch, 90 App. Div. 151, affirmed.
(Argued February 27, 1905;
decided March 14, 1905.)
Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered February 3, 190fi, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a decision of the court at a Trial Term without a jury.
Edwa/rd W. S. Johnston and Henry Tompkins for appellant.
George E. Morgan and Gharries N. Morgan for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Gray, O’Brien, Bartlett, Haight, Vann and Werner, JJ.