Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
INTERNATIONAL TEXTBOOK COMPANY v. PETERSON; SAME v. LYNCH, 1910 — 218 U.S. 664 · caselaw · US
General
INTERNATIONAL TEXTBOOK COMPANY v. PETERSON; SAME v. LYNCH
218 U.S. 66431 S. Ct. 225·Supreme Court of the United States·1910
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
INTERNATIONAL TEXTBOOK COMPANY v. PETERSON. SAME v. LYNCH.
ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF WISCONSIN.
ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF VERMONT.
No. 3.
No. 27.
Submitted October 24, 1910.
Decided November 7, 1910.
Submitted November 2, 1910.
Decided November 7, 1910.
Decided on authority of International Textbook Co. v. Pigg, 217 U. S. 91.
Mr. David C. Harrington for plaintiff in error.
No briefs filed for defendants in error.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam:]
Per Curiam:
Substantially the same question of Federal law involved in these two cases arose under a Kansas statute in International Textbook Co. v. Pigg, 217 U. S. 91; and the Federal right asserted in that case was sustained. There is no difference in principle between the two cases last named and the Pigg case, although the Federal question involved in them, arises under the statutes, respectively, of other States — Wisconsin and Vermont. In view of the pleadings and the conceded facts in these cases the judgment in each of them must be reversed on the authority , of the Pigg case, and the cases are severally remanded for such further proceedings as is required by and is not inconsistent with this opinion.
It is so ordered.