General
George SHOULHOUP, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee
41 F.2d 1014·United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·1930
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
George SHOULHOUP, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee.
No. 3054.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
July 9, 1930.
Jo. N. Kernna, of Charleston, W. Va., for appellant.
James Damron, U. S. Atty., of Huntington; W. Va.
Before PARKER and NORTHCOTT, Circuit Judges, and CRONER, District Judge.
[MAJORITY — PER CÍJRIAM.]
PER CÍJRIAM.
We have carefully examined the record in this case in the light of appellant’s brief, and we think that the exceptions relied on axe so devoid of merit as not to justify discussion. The record contains ample evidence of defendant’s guilt, it shows no reversible error in the admission or exclusion of testimony, and it contains nothing to indicate that the defendant did not receive in all respects a fair and impartial trial. While the sentence imposed was severe, it did not exceed the limit prescribed by law.
Affirmed,