Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
UNION TRANSIT LINE, Appellant, v. George A. HENSHAW et al., Receivers, 1928 — 25 F.2d 1023 · caselaw · US
General
UNION TRANSIT LINE, Appellant, v. George A. HENSHAW et al., Receivers
25 F.2d 1023·United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit·1928
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
UNION TRANSIT LINE, Appellant, v. George A. HENSHAW et al., Receivers.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.
March 6, 1928.
No. 7530.
Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Western District of Oklahoma.
Warren K. Snyder and Edward C. Snyder, both of Oklahoma City, Okl., for appellant.
J. B. Dudley and Kent W. Shartel, both of Oklahoma City, Okl., for appellees.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed, with costs, per stipulation and decree in No. 7529, People’s Transit Co. v. George A. Henshaw et al., opinion reported in 20 F.(2d) 87.