Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Julius Willsen, as Administrator of the Estate of Lawrence Willsen, Deceased, Appellant, v. Metropolitan Street Railway Company, Respondent, 1905 — 182 N.Y. 510 · caselaw · US
General
Julius Willsen, as Administrator of the Estate of Lawrence Willsen, Deceased, Appellant, v. Metropolitan Street Railway Company, Respondent
182 N.Y. 510·New York Court of Appeals·1905·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Julius Willsen, as Administrator of the Estate of Lawrence Willsen, Deceased, Appellant, v. Metropolitan Street Railway Company, Respondent.
(Argued May 29, 1905;
decided June 6, 1905.)
Reported below, 95 App. Div. 388.
Motion for leave to withdraw an appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered June 23, 1904, reversing a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a verdict and an order denying a motion for a new trial.
The motion was made upon the ground that the order of reversal failed to state that such reversal was solely upon questions of law and the. appellant herein had been' unable to have such order amended.
William McArthur for motion.
Bayard H. Ames and Henry A. Robinson opposed.
[MAJORITY]
Motion granted on payment of costs in this court accrued to date, without costs of motion.