Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
MacKENZIE v. MacKENZIE, 1909 — 215 U.S. 582 · caselaw · US
General
MacKENZIE v. MacKENZIE
215 U.S. 582·Supreme Court of the United States·1909
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
MacKENZIE v. MacKENZIE.
ERROR T.O THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS.
No. 465.
Motion to dismiss submitted October 11, 1909.
Decided October 18, 1909.
A writ of error to review the judgment of the highest court of a State dismissed for want of jurisdiction without opinion.
Writ of error to,review 238 Illinois, 616, dismissed.
Mr. R. G. Dyrmforth for the plaintiff in error.
Mr. Harris F. Williams for the defendant in error.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam.]
Per Curiam.
Dismissed for want of jurisdiction.