Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
In the Matter of the Application of The East River Bridge Company, 1894 — 144 N.Y. 650 · caselaw · US
General
In the Matter of the Application of The East River Bridge Company
144 N.Y. 650·New York Court of Appeals·1894·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
In the Matter of the Application of The East River Bridge Company.
(Submitted November 26, 1894;
decided December 18, 1894.)
Motion to amend remittitur.
Morris <& Steele for motion.
Hoadley, Lauterbaeh & Jo/mson opposed.
Case reported, 143 N. Y. 249.
[MAJORITY]
Agree to amend remittitur so as to read “ that the appeal is dismissed, with costs to each respondent, or set of respondents, in whose behalf an appearance was made and a brief filed in this court; ” no opinion.
All concur.
Ordered accordingly.