Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
New Jersey Shipbuilding & Dredging Company, Libelant-Appellee, v. Steam Tug ENERGY, Her Engines, etc.; James Hughes, Jr., Claimant-Appellant, 1927 — 19 F.2d 1016 · caselaw · US
General
New Jersey Shipbuilding & Dredging Company, Libelant-Appellee, v. Steam Tug ENERGY, Her Engines, etc.; James Hughes, Jr., Claimant-Appellant
19 F.2d 1016·United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit·1927
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
New Jersey Shipbuilding & Dredging Company, Libelant-Appellee, v. Steam Tug ENERGY, Her Engines, etc.; James Hughes, Jr., Claimant-Appellant.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.
May 2, 1927.
No. 293.
Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Southern District of New York.
Barry, Wainwright, Thacher & Symmers, of New York City (James K. Symmers and Earle Farwell, both of New York City, of counsel), for appellant.
Alexander & Ash, of New York City (Peter Alexander, of New York City, of counsel), for appellee.
before MANTON and SWAN, Circuit Judges, and CAMPBELL, District Judge.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
Decree affirmed, with costs.