General
Jesse Jones, Respondent, v. The Brooklyn, Bath and West End Railroad Company, Appellant
121 N.Y. 683·New York Court of Appeals·1890·NY
All concur, except Earl, J., dissenting.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Jesse Jones, Respondent, v. The Brooklyn, Bath and West End Railroad Company, Appellant.
(Argued May 2, 1890;
decided June 3, 1890.)
Appeal from judgment of the General Term of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered upon an order made December 24, 1888, which affirmed a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a verdict, and affirmed an order denying a motion for a new trial.
Wathaniel C. Moak for appellant.
Charles J. Patterson for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Agree to affirm; no opinion.
All concur, except Earl, J., dissenting.
Judgment affirmed.