Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Chicago & North Western Railway Co. v. Mutual Savings Bank Group Committee et al.; Louis Susman et al., Convertible Bond Owners, v. Mutual Savings Bank Group Committee et al.; City Bank Farmers Trust Co., Trustee, v. Life Insurance Group Committee et al.; Irving Trust Co., Successor Trustee, v. Mutual Savings Bank Group Committee et al.; Protective Committee for Holders of Common Stock v. Mutual Savings Bank Group Committee et al.; and Protective Committee for Holders of Preferred Stock et al. v. Mutual Savings Bank Group Committee et al., 1943 — 318 U.S. 793 · caselaw · US
Contracts · MBE-tested
Chicago & North Western Railway Co. v. Mutual Savings Bank Group Committee et al.; Louis Susman et al., Convertible Bond Owners, v. Mutual Savings Bank Group Committee et al.; City Bank Farmers Trust Co., Trustee, v. Life Insurance Group Committee et al.; Irving Trust Co., Successor Trustee, v. Mutual Savings Bank Group Committee et al.; Protective Committee for Holders of Common Stock v. Mutual Savings Bank Group Committee et al.; and Protective Committee for Holders of Preferred Stock et al. v. Mutual Savings Bank Group Committee et al.
318 U.S. 793·Supreme Court of the United States·1943
Mr. Justice Rutledge took no part in the consideration or decision of these applications.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Nos. 34, 35, and 36.
Chicago & North Western Railway Co. v. Mutual Savings Bank Group Committee et al.; Louis Susman et al., Convertible Bond Owners, v. Mutual Savings Bank Group Committee et al.; City Bank Farmers Trust Co., Trustee, v. Life Insurance Group Committee et al.; Irving Trust Co., Successor Trustee, v. Mutual Savings Bank Group Committee et al.; Protective Committee for Holders of Common Stock v. Mutual Savings Bank Group Committee et al.; and Protective Committee for Holders of Preferred Stock et al. v. Mutual Savings Bank Group Committee et al.
Nos. 37 and 38.
Nos. 56 and 57.
Nos. 62, 63, and 64.
Nos. 68 and 69.
Nos. 83 and 84.
April 19, 1943.
[MAJORITY]
Petitions for writs of certiorari to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.
Mrs. Helen W. Munsert and Mr. Luther M. Walter for the Chicago & North Western Railway Co.; Mr. Meyer Abrams for Louis Susman et al.; Messrs. John B. Marsh and Edward E. Watts, Jr., for the City Bank Farmers Trust Co., Trustee; Messrs. Harold C. McCollom and Orrin G. Judd for the Irving Trust Co., Successor Trustee; Mr. Harry N. Wyatt for the Protective Committee for Holders of Common Stock; and Messrs. John M. MacGregor and Harry I. Allen for the Protective Committee for Holders of Preferred Stock, et al., — petitioners. Solicitor General Fahy and Messrs. James L. Homire and Emmet McCaffery for the Reconstruction Finance Corporation; Messrs. Kenneth F. Burgess, Douglas F. Smith, Fred N. Oliver, and Willard P. Scott for Mutual Savings Bank Group et al.; Messrs. William A. W. Stewart and William B. Hale for the United States Trust Co., Trustee; Messrs. Edward K. Hanlon and Ernest S.-Ballard for the New York Trust Co., Trustee; Mr. Leonard D. Adkins for George W. Bovenizer et al.; Messrs. Edwin S. S. Sunder-land, Thomas O’G. FitzGibbon, and Henry F. Tenney for the Guaranty Trust Co., Trustee; and Mr. Alfred H. Phillips for the Chemical Bank & Trust Co., Successor Trustee,— respondents.
Mr. Justice Rutledge took no part in the consideration or decision of these applications.