Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Mary D. Sherman, Respondent, v. Levi C. Weir, as President of the Adams Express Company, Appellant, 1903 — 174 N.Y. 525 · caselaw · US
General
Mary D. Sherman, Respondent, v. Levi C. Weir, as President of the Adams Express Company, Appellant
174 N.Y. 525·New York Court of Appeals·1903·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Mary D. Sherman, Respondent, v. Levi C. Weir, as President of the Adams Express Company, Appellant.
Sherman v. Weir, 76 App. Div. 628, appeal dismissed.
(Argued March 16, 1903;
decided March 24, 1903.)
Motion to dismiss an appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered November 29, 1902, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon the report of a referee.
The motion was made upon the ground that no exception appeared in the record which raised any question of law, except such as was frivolous.
Roger M. Sherman for motion.
Richard Reid Rogers opposed.
[MAJORITY]
Motion granted and appeal dismissed, with costs in this court and ten dollars costs of motion.