Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Public Affairs Associates, Inc., trading as Public Affairs Press, v. Rickover; and Rickover v. Public Affairs Associates, Inc., trading as Public Affairs Press, 1961 — 365 U.S. 841 · caselaw · US
General
Public Affairs Associates, Inc., trading as Public Affairs Press, v. Rickover; and Rickover v. Public Affairs Associates, Inc., trading as Public Affairs Press
365 U.S. 841·Supreme Court of the United States·1961
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 649.
No. 739.
Public Affairs Associates, Inc., trading as Public Affairs Press, v. Rickover; and Rickover v. Public Affairs Associates, Inc., trading as Public Affairs Press.
Stanley B. Frosh and Harry N. Rosenfield for petitioner in No. 649 and respondent in No. 739.
Joseph A. McDonald, Edwin S. Nail and Harry Buchman for respondent in No. 649 and petitioner in No. 739.
[MAJORITY]
United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. Certiorari granted.
Reported below: 109 U. S. App. D. C. 128, 284 F. 2d 262;-U. S. App. D. C.-,-F. 2d-.