Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
John Andrews, Jr., Individually and as Executor of John Andrews, Deceased, et al., Appellants, v. John McNamara and The City of Brooklyn, Respondents, 1899 — 158 N.Y. 673 · caselaw · US
General
John Andrews, Jr., Individually and as Executor of John Andrews, Deceased, et al., Appellants, v. John McNamara and The City of Brooklyn, Respondents
158 N.Y. 673·New York Court of Appeals·1899·NY
All concur.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
John Andrews, Jr., Individually and as Executor of John Andrews, Deceased, et al., Appellants, v. John McNamara and The City of Brooklyn, Respondents.
(Submitted January 13, 1899;
decided January 31, 1899.)
Appeal from a judgment of the General Term of the late City Court of Brooklyn, entered December 10,1894, affirming a judgment in favor of defendants entered upon a decision of the court dismissing the complaint on trial at Special Term.
John Andrews, Jr., for appellants.
Alfred E. Mudge, William J. Carr and John Whalen for respondents.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
All concur.