Contracts · MBE-tested
BOSTON & MAINE RAILROAD et al. v. UNITED STATES et al.
371 U.S. 26·Supreme Court of the United States·1962
Mr. Justice White took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
BOSTON & MAINE RAILROAD et al. v. UNITED STATES et al.
No. 230.
Decided October 15, 1962.
Joseph F. Eshelman, James Garfield, Conrad W. Oberdorfer, Kenneth H. I/undmark, R. G. Bleakney, Jr., R. D. Brooks, R. B. Claytor, E. A. Kaier, W. T. Pierson and D. M. Tolmie for appellants.
Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Loevinger, Robert B. Hummel, Elliott H. Moyer and Robert W. Ginnane for the United States and the Interstate Commerce Commission.
R. Wray Henriott, W. L. Grubbs and Joseph L. Lenihan for the Louisville & Nashville Railroad Co. et al., appellees.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam.]
Per Curiam.
The motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed.
Mr. Justice White took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.