Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
David Sullivan et al., Respondents, v. John Eusner, Appellant, Impleaded with Others, 1900 — 163 N.Y. 576 · caselaw · US
General
David Sullivan et al., Respondents, v. John Eusner, Appellant, Impleaded with Others
163 N.Y. 576·New York Court of Appeals·1900·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
David Sullivan et al., Respondents, v. John Eusner, Appellant, Impleaded with Others.
Sullivan v. Eusner, 27 App. Div. 103, affirmed.
(Argued May 14, 1900;
decided June 5, 1900.)
Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered March 16, 1898, reversing a judgment in favor of defendant entered upon a dismissal of the complaint by the court at Special Term, and granting a new trial.
Louis Wendel, Jr., for appellant.
Robert MeO. Robinson for respondents.
[MAJORITY]
Order affirmed and judgment absolute ordered for plaintiffs on the stipulation, with costs.
Concur : Parker, Ch. J., Gray, O’Brien, Haight, Martin, Landon and Werner, JJ.