Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Pike et al. v. Walker, Postmaster General, et al., 1941 — 314 U.S. 625 · caselaw · US
Contracts · MBE-tested
Pike et al. v. Walker, Postmaster General, et al.
314 U.S. 625·Supreme Court of the United States·1941
Mr. Justice Jackson took no part in the consideration and decision of this application.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 285.
Pike et al. v. Walker, Postmaster General, et al.
October 13, 1941.
Mr. Horace J. Donnelly, Jr. for petitioners. Assistant Solicitor General Fahy, Assistant Attorney General Berge, and Mr. Oscar A. Provost for respondents.
[MAJORITY]
Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia denied.
Mr. Justice Jackson took no part in the consideration and decision of this application.