Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Martin v. Schweiker, Secretary of Health and Human Services, 1982 — 454 U.S. 1165 · caselaw · US
General
Martin v. Schweiker, Secretary of Health and Human Services
454 U.S. 1165·Supreme Court of the United States·1982
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 81-5462.
Martin v. Schweiker, Secretary of Health and Human Services.
[MAJORITY]
C. A. 10th Cir. Certio-rari denied.
[DISSENT — Justice White,]
Justice White,
dissenting.
Because the decision of the Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit in this case conflicts with the decision of the Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit in Rosenberg v. Richardson, 538 F. 2d 487 (1976), I would grant the petition for certiorari.
Rehearing Denied