Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Frank C. Clark, Appellant, v. Metropolitan Street Railway Company, Respondent, 1903 — 175 N.Y. 476 · caselaw · US
General
Frank C. Clark, Appellant, v. Metropolitan Street Railway Company, Respondent
175 N.Y. 476·New York Court of Appeals·1903·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Frank C. Clark, Appellant, v. Metropolitan Street Railway Company, Respondent.
Clark v. Metropolitan Street Ry. Co., 68 App. Div. 49, appeal dismissed.
(Submitted May 5, 1903;
decided May 19, 1903.)
Appeal from an order of the Appellate Divison of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered February 25, 1902, which reversed a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a verdict and an order denying a motion for a new trial and granted a new trial.
Alexander S. Bacon for appellant.
Charles F. Brown, Bayard H. Ames and Henry A. Robinson for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Appeal dismissed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Parker, Ch. J., Gray, O’Brien, Bartlett, Haight, Martin and Vann, JJ.