General
John Carlton DYSART, Petitioner, v. W. A. BOYNTON, United States District Judge, and John D. Hartman, United States Attorney for the Western District of Texas, Respondents
14 F.2d 1022·United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·1926
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
John Carlton DYSART, Petitioner, v. W. A. BOYNTON, United States District Judge, and John D. Hartman, United States Attorney for the Western District of Texas, Respondents.
(Circuit Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
November 3, 1926.)
No. 4872.
Petition for mandamus.
Suit in forma pauperis.
John Carlton Dysart, of Amarillo, Tex., in pro. per.
John D. Hartman, U. S. Atty., of San Antonio, Tex., for respondents.
Before WALKER, BRYAN, and FOSTER, Circuit Judges.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
It not. appearing that any proposed bill of exceptions was presented to the trial judge during the term of the court at which petitioner was tried, or during the further time allowed by any order made in that regard, the petition for the writ of mandamus is denied.