Corporations
Glantz v. Michigan Corporation & Securities Commission et al.
340 U.S. 924·Supreme Court of the United States·1951
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 503.
Glantz v. Michigan Corporation & Securities Commission et al.
Appellant pro se. Frank G. Millard, Attorney General of Michigan, Edmund E. Shepherd, Solicitor General, and Daniel J. O’Hara, Assistant Attorney General, for appellees.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam:]
Per Curiam:
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for the want of a substantial federal question.