General
Ratner v. California
321 U.S. 755·Supreme Court of the United States·1944
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 794.
Ratner v. California.
April 3, 1944.
Mr. Morris Lavine for appellant. Messrs. Ray L. Chesebro and John L. Bland for appellee.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam:]
Appeal from the Appellate Department of the Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles.
Per Curiam:
The appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. (1) Nash v. United States, 229 U. S. 373, 376-7; United States v. Ragen, 314 U. S. 513, 523-4; (2) Casey v. United States, 276 U. S. 413, 418; Bandini Petroleum Co. v. Superior Court, 284 U. S. 8, 18-19.