Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Jane Greer et al., Respondents, v. The New York Central and Hudson River Railroad Company, Appellant, 1887 — 107 N.Y. 682 · caselaw · US
General
Jane Greer et al., Respondents, v. The New York Central and Hudson River Railroad Company, Appellant
107 N.Y. 682·New York Court of Appeals·1887·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Jane Greer et al., Respondents, v. The New York Central and Hudson River Railroad Company, Appellant.
(Argued November 30, 1887;
decided December 23, 1887.)
Matthew Hale for appellant.
■ Amasa J. Pa/rker for respondents.
[MAJORITY]
Agree to affirm on opinions helow.
All concur; no opinion.
Judgment affirmed.