Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Francis Paris Osborn et al., Repondents, v. Samuel Edgar et al., Impleaded, etc., Appellants, 1892 — 132 N.Y. 579 · caselaw · US
General
Francis Paris Osborn et al., Repondents, v. Samuel Edgar et al., Impleaded, etc., Appellants
132 N.Y. 579·New York Court of Appeals·1892·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Francis Paris Osborn et al., Repondents, v. Samuel Edgar et al., Impleaded, etc., Appellants.
(Argued March 8, 1892;
decided March 22, 1892.)
Appeal from judgment of the General Term of the Superior Court of the city of New York in favor of plaintiffs, entered upon an order made May 28, 1890, upon an agreed case submitted under section 1279 of the Code of Civil Procedure.
Charles F. Itashmore for appellants.
John N. Benois for respondents.
[MAJORITY]
Agree to affirm ; no opinion.
All concur.
Judgment affirmed.