Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Frances T. Brown, Respondent, v. Alonzo Blackman, Individually and as Executor of Lester Blackman, Deceased, Appellant, 1897 — 151 N.Y. 670 · caselaw · US
General
Frances T. Brown, Respondent, v. Alonzo Blackman, Individually and as Executor of Lester Blackman, Deceased, Appellant
151 N.Y. 670·New York Court of Appeals·1897·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Frances T. Brown, Respondent, v. Alonzo Blackman, Individually and as Executor of Lester Blackman, Deceased, Appellant.
Brown v. Blackman, 71 Hun, 356, affirmed.
(Argued January 27, 1897;
decided February 12, 1897.)
Appeal from an order of the General Term of the Supreme Court in the fourth judicial department, entered October 7, 1893, which reversed a judgment in favor of defendant entered upon a decision of the court dismissing the complaint on trial at Special Term and granted a new trial.
George W. Ray for appellant.
John W. Church for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Order affirmed and judgment absolute ordered for plaintiff, with costs, on opinion below.
All concur.