General
Margaret Churchill, Appellant, v. Lawton Caten, Respondent
181 N.Y. 526·New York Court of Appeals·1905·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Margaret Churchill, Appellant, v. Lawton Caten, Respondent.
Churchill v. Caten, 90 App. Div. 617, affirmed.
(Argued March 3, 1905;
decided March 17, 1905.)
Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the third judicial department, entered January 16, 1904, affirming a judgment in favor of defendant entered upon a decision of the court on trial at Special Term.
Frank Talbot and John E. dMJLean for appellant.
Andt/rew J. Nellis for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment affirmed, with costs ; no opinion.
Concur : Cullen, Ch. J., Gray, Bartlett, Haight, Yann and Werner, JJ. Not voting: O’Brien, J.