Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Alabama-Tennessee Natural Gas Co. v. Federal Power Commission et al., 1966 — 385 U.S. 847 · caselaw · US
General
Alabama-Tennessee Natural Gas Co. v. Federal Power Commission et al.
385 U.S. 847·Supreme Court of the United States·1966
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 286.
Alabama-Tennessee Natural Gas Co. v. Federal Power Commission et al.
Stanley M. Morley and Francis H. Gaskin for petitioner.
Solicitor General Marshall, Richard A. Solomon, Howard E. Wahrenbrock and Peter H. SchijJ for Federal Power Commission, and Reuben Goldberg for Tennessee Valley Municipal Gas Association, respondents.
Christopher T. Boland, George J. Meiburger and Harry L. Albrecht for Independent Natural Gas Association of America, as amicus curiae, in support of the petition.
[MAJORITY]
C. A. 5th Cir. Motion of Tennessee Valley Municipal Gas Association to be added as a party respondent granted. Certiorari denied.