General
The Chemung Canal National Bank, Appellant, v. The City of Elmira, Respondent. The Second National Bank of Elmira, Appellant, v. The Same, Respondent. James Gopsill, Respondent, v. Joseph K. Heath, Appellant
53 N.Y. 609·New York Court of Appeals·1873·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
The Chemung Canal National Bank, Appellant, v. The City of Elmira, Respondent. The Second National Bank of Elmira, Appellant, v. The Same, Respondent. James Gopsill, Respondent, v. Joseph K. Heath, Appellant.
These two cases presented the same questions, and were argued and decided with the National Bank of Chemung,, of Elmira, v. The City of Elmira (ante, page 49).
(Argued May 15, 1873;
decided May 27, 1873.)
H. F. Hatch for the appellant.
E. A. Doolittle for the respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Agree to affirm. No opinion.
Judgment affirmed.