Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
The Lessee of Thomas v. Horlocker, 1766 — 1 U.S. 14 · caselaw · US
Property · MBE-tested
The Lessee of Thomas v. Horlocker
1 U.S. 141 Dall. 14·Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·1766·PA
Present, William Allen, Chief Justice, William Coleman and Alexander Stedman, Justices.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
SEPTEMBER TERM, 1766.
Present, William Allen, Chief Justice, William Coleman and Alexander Stedman, Justices.
The Lessee of Thomas v. Horlocker.
Ancient deeds.
[MAJORITY]
Plaintiff produced a deed, bearing date sixty-three years ago, appearing on inspection to he ancient; one of the witnesses proved to he dead, the other not known. Possession had not attended the deed, and no oth r account was given of it, or the witnesses, than by the evidence of a person who swore he had well known one of the witnesses, and had seen many deeds and papers signed by him, and from thence believed his name to this deed, to be of his handwriting, but had never seen him write. The Court, on debate, thought this a sufficient proof of the deed, considering its antiquity, and it was read in evidence.