Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Hutchinson Southgate, as Trustee under the Will of Charles L. R. Hutchinson, Deceased, Appellant, v. The Continental Trust Company of the City of New York et al., Respondents, and Renee C. Southgate et al., Appellants and Respondents, 1903 — 173 N.Y. 602 · caselaw · US
General
Hutchinson Southgate, as Trustee under the Will of Charles L. R. Hutchinson, Deceased, Appellant, v. The Continental Trust Company of the City of New York et al., Respondents, and Renee C. Southgate et al., Appellants and Respondents
173 N.Y. 602·New York Court of Appeals·1903·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Hutchinson Southgate, as Trustee under the Will of Charles L. R. Hutchinson, Deceased, Appellant, v. The Continental Trust Company of the City of New York et al., Respondents, and Renee C. Southgate et al., Appellants and Respondents.
Southgate v. Continental Trust Co., 74 App. Div., 150, appeal dismissed.
(Submitted January 5, 1903;
decided January 13, 1903.)
Motion to dismiss appeals of defendants Renee ”C. South-gate and others from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, which modified, and affirmed as modified, a judgment of Special Term construing the last will and testament of Charles L. R. Hutchinson, deceased.
The motion was made upon the ground that the said appellants had failed to perfect their appeal by filing the undertaking required by section 1326 of the Code of Civil Procedure.
Oliver J. Wells for motion.
No one opposed.
[MAJORITY]
Motion granted and appeal dismissed, with costs againsl said defendants.