Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Hill v. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad Co., 1949 — 336 U.S. 911 · caselaw · US
General
Hill v. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad Co.
336 U.S. 911·Supreme Court of the United States·1949
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
February 14, 1949.
Per Curiam Decision.
No. 472.
Hill v. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad Co.
Isaac D. Thorp for petitioner. Thomas W. Davis and F. S. Spruill for respondent.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam:]
Per Curiam:
The petition for writ of certiorari is granted and the judgment of the Supreme Court of North Carolina is reversed. See Tiller v. Atlantic Coast Line R. Co., 318 U. S. 54 (1943); Bailey v. Central Vermont R. Co., 319 U. S. 350 (1943); and Ellis v. Union Pacific R. Co., 329 U. S. 649 (1947). Mr. Justice Frankfurter is of opinion that the petition for certiorari should not be granted, for reasons indicated in his concurring opinion in Wilkerson v. McCarthy, 336 U. S. 53, at p. 64.