Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Theresa Lynch, Respondent, v. The First National Bank of Jersey City, Appellant, 1890 — 119 N.Y. 635 · caselaw · US
General
Theresa Lynch, Respondent, v. The First National Bank of Jersey City, Appellant
119 N.Y. 635·New York Court of Appeals·1890·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Theresa Lynch, Respondent, v. The First National Bank of Jersey City, Appellant.
(Argued January 20, 1890;
decided February 25, 1890.)
Appeal from judgment of the General Term of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered upon an order made July 9, 1889, which reversed a judgment in favor of defendant and granted a new trial.
Agree to affirm. Order and judgment absolute ordered on stipulation, with costs.
Hamilton Wallis for appellant.
Abram Kling for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Agree to affirm; no opinion.
All concur, except Finch and Gray, JJ., dissenting.
Judgment accordingly.