Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
James Flanagan, Plaintiff, v. John C. Shaw et al., Defendants. William P. Beach, Appellant; William Buhler, as Executor of William Buhler, Deceased, Respondent, 1903 — 174 N.Y. 530 · caselaw · US
General
James Flanagan, Plaintiff, v. John C. Shaw et al., Defendants. William P. Beach, Appellant; William Buhler, as Executor of William Buhler, Deceased, Respondent
174 N.Y. 530·New York Court of Appeals·1903·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
James Flanagan, Plaintiff, v. John C. Shaw et al., Defendants. William P. Beach, Appellant; William Buhler, as Executor of William Buhler, Deceased, Respondent.
Flanagan v. Shaw, 74 App. Div. 508, affirmed.
(Argued March 16, 1903;
decided March 31, 1903.)
Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered July 8, 1902, which affirmed an order of Special Term confirming the report of a referee awarding a certain fund to the respondent herein.
Augustus Van Wyck and John O. Shaw for appellant.
Kewell Martin and Edward B. Whitney for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Order affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Parker, Ch. J., O’Brien, Bartlett, Haight, Vann, Cullen and Werner, JJ.