Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
George O. Lord, Appellant, v. Citizens' Steamboat Company, Respondent, 1906 — 186 N.Y. 604 · caselaw · US
Tax
George O. Lord, Appellant, v. Citizens' Steamboat Company, Respondent
186 N.Y. 604·New York Court of Appeals·1906·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
George O. Lord, Appellant, v. Citizens’ Steamboat Company, Respondent.
Reported below, 106 App. Div. 610.
(Submitted December 3, 1906;
decided December 11, 1906.)
Motion for leave to withdraw appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered June 9, 1905, which reversed a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a verdict and an order denying a motion for a new; trial.
The motion was made upon the ground that the appeal had been inadvertently taken, the form of the order of reversal precluding the Court of Appeals from reviewing the questions of law involved.
Wray & Callaghan for motion.
Noble, Jackson & Hubbard opposed.
[MAJORITY]
Motion granted on payment, within ten days, of taxable costs, including argument fee. Upon failure to comply with these conditions, motion denied, with ten dollars costs: