Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
LACQUER & CHEMICAL CORPORATION, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Chester P. MILLS, et al., Defendants-Appellees, 1927 — 22 F.2d 700 · caselaw · US
Corporations
LACQUER & CHEMICAL CORPORATION, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Chester P. MILLS, et al., Defendants-Appellees
22 F.2d 700·United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit·1927
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
LACQUER & CHEMICAL CORPORATION, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Chester P. MILLS, et al., Defendants-Appellees.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.
October 14, 1927.
No. 34.
Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Eastern District of New York.
Affirming order, 22 F.(2d) 697.
Before MANTON, SWAN, and AUGUSTUS N. HAND, Circuit Judges.
Philip Edward Ittmann, of New York City (J. P. Ratcliffe and R. T. Roetschi, both of Washington, D. C., of counsel), for appellant.
William A. De Groot, U. S. Atty., of Brooklyn, N. Y. (Herbert H. Kellogg, Asst. U. S. Atty., and John E. O’Neill, Sp. U. S. Atty., both of Brooklyn, N. Y., of counsel), for appellees.
Certiorari denied 48 Sup. Ct. 212, 72 L. Ed. —.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed in open court.