Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
In the Matter of the Petition of John D. Campbell, Respondent, for an Order Revoking and Canceling Liquor Tax Certificate No. 24,279, Issued to William F. Robinett, Appellant. Daniel O'Grady, Special Deputy Commissioner of Excise, Respondent, 1900 — 162 N.Y. 612 · caselaw · US
Tax
In the Matter of the Petition of John D. Campbell, Respondent, for an Order Revoking and Canceling Liquor Tax Certificate No. 24,279, Issued to William F. Robinett, Appellant. Daniel O'Grady, Special Deputy Commissioner of Excise, Respondent
162 N.Y. 612·New York Court of Appeals·1900·NY
Concur: Pabkeb, Ch. J., Baetlett, Haight, Mabtin, Yann and Landon, JJ. Not voting, O’Bbien, J.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
In the Matter of the Petition of John D. Campbell, Respondent, for an Order Revoking and Canceling Liquor Tax Certificate No. 24,279, Issued to William F. Robinett, Appellant. Daniel O’Grady, Special Deputy Commissioner of Excise, Respondent.
Matter of Campbell, 46 App. Div. 634, affirmed.
(Argued February 27, 1900;
decided March 13, 1900.)
Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the fourth judicial department, entered January 2, 1900, reversing an order of Special Term dismissing an application for the revocation of a liquor tax certificate, and granting such application.
Moses Shire for appellant.
P. W. Cullinan and L. H. Jones for respondents.
[MAJORITY]
Order affirmed, with costs, on opinion below.
Concur: Pabkeb, Ch. J., Baetlett, Haight, Mabtin, Yann and Landon, JJ. Not voting, O’Bbien, J.